Post
by Lorewarden » Tue Nov 18, 2003 1:16 am
For that matter if you really want to get anal about it..take a look at what kind of arrowheads are likely to exist.
Broadheads, or the medieval equivelant, are the classic triangle shape used in hunting, fairly useless against heavily armored targets they are good for animals and horses, these had anywhere between 2 and 4 cutting edges. Removing one of these from the victim required either surgery (i.e. cutting open) or pushing through. Pushing an arrow through could possibly damage the fletching as well as offer the chance of breaking the wooden shaft. Pulling guarantees losing the tip in the target. with the possible exception of perhaps the anglo-saxon broadhead which generally wasnt barbed but was a diamond shaped tip
Needle bodkins, which to me are slightly reminiscent of todays field points were designed to penetrate armor, they generally were long needle looking items with a diamond, square or triangular cross section. These could be pulled back out of the target but you would most likely leave the tip in the target, I have no doubt that initial impact would dull the tip, or possibly even curl it over hook like (a very small portion of the tip mind you) you certianly arent pushing it through the back armor of the target.
So you could make an argument that the number of arrows that could be recoverable would be very low...on the other hand, arrows that miss that do not strike a rock would be quite reusable, provided you can find them....I have lost arrows in banks of iceplant, open fields (where they literally shoot under the surface layer of grass) and it pains you to lose a nice aluminum shaft arrow!!
Its been a long long time since I had anything to do with archery and all of the above was from faded memory, so hopefully someone more knowledgable will chime in and tell me where I'm wrong.