Arcane spell failure?
Moderator: Event DM
-
- Whiney Peasant
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 9:31 am
Arcane spell failure?
I am a fighter/bard and wear armour. How do I get around arcane spell failure. Is there a feat that will help? Thanks. deth
- Dirk Cutlass
- Elder Sage
- Posts: 4691
- Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 9:42 am
- Location: GMT
What you're looking for is the meta-magic feat Still Spell. It allows the spells to be cast without the somantic components (i.e. no movement, just verbal).
Spells used in this manner occupy 1 spell level slot higher than normal, e.g. a lvl 2 spell takes up a lvl 3 slot.
Some spells do not have somantic components, e.g. Darkness, True Strike .. I'm sure there are others.
There is armor out there with reduced arcane failure % chance, however it will be expensive and/or not as good as a good thick set of plate.
Spells used in this manner occupy 1 spell level slot higher than normal, e.g. a lvl 2 spell takes up a lvl 3 slot.
Some spells do not have somantic components, e.g. Darkness, True Strike .. I'm sure there are others.
There is armor out there with reduced arcane failure % chance, however it will be expensive and/or not as good as a good thick set of plate.
- mortzestus
- Team Member; Retired with Honors
- Posts: 3964
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 4:34 pm
- Location: Madrid, Spain (GMT +1)
There are several ways around this. The easiest one is probably to not wear armour (heh) or wear a light armour, unequip your shield to cast and hope for the best. There are also armours with reduced arcane casting failure out there but they don't seem to be common at all and the few ones i have seen for sale are always expensive.
This said, the best thing you can probably do is to take the Still Spell feat and to cast spells without a somatic component, specially if your character uses heavy armours and shields: this works for my own character.
There's a list of bard spells without somatic component in the bard forum.
This said, the best thing you can probably do is to take the Still Spell feat and to cast spells without a somatic component, specially if your character uses heavy armours and shields: this works for my own character.
There's a list of bard spells without somatic component in the bard forum.
-
- Team Member; Retired with Honors
- Posts: 3788
- Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 12:08 pm
- Timezone: GMT+1
- Location: the Netherlands GMT+1
In my experience, arcane spell failure, even if the chance is just 10%, ALWAYS happens at the worst possible moments (imagine yourself being chased by hordes of angry foes, and your improved invisibility fizzles before your eyes). So it is probably best not to cast while in armor, or take the still feats (as suggested above).The easiest one is probably to not wear armour (heh) or wear a light armour, unequip your shield to cast and hope for the best.
All I can tell you is that... you've got to play the cards life deals you. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. But at least you're in the game. - Vic Fontaine, DS9.
-
- Whiney Peasant
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 9:31 am
- mortzestus
- Team Member; Retired with Honors
- Posts: 3964
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 4:34 pm
- Location: Madrid, Spain (GMT +1)
Yes, but you can't always do this. What does a bard in full plate and tower shield who wants to cast Mass Haste? He unequips his shield and hopes that the 45% arcane casting failure doesn't kick in, bards cannot still level 6 spells.Marijn wrote:In my experience, arcane spell failure, even if the chance is just 10%, ALWAYS happens at the worst possible moments (imagine yourself being chased by hordes of angry foes, and your improved invisibility fizzles before your eyes). So it is probably best not to cast while in armor, or take the still feats (as suggested above).The easiest one is probably to not wear armour (heh) or wear a light armour, unequip your shield to cast and hope for the best.
For the record, i used to have a nice leather armour that i liked to wear in low-risk situations and i ended discarding it in favour of either no armour or full plate: the damn 10% was kicking in like 50% of the time, lol. Or so it seemed to me.

-
- Whiney Peasant
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 9:31 am
-
- Team Member; Retired with Honors
- Posts: 3788
- Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 12:08 pm
- Timezone: GMT+1
- Location: the Netherlands GMT+1
Mozertus wrote:
*kicks the engine*
The same happened to me, so now its no armour at all.. isnt this a great example of Murphy's law?For the record, i used to have a nice leather armour that i liked to wear in low-risk situations and i ended discarding it in favour of either no armour or full plate: the damn 10% was kicking in like 50% of the time, lol. Or so it seemed to me.
*kicks the engine*

All I can tell you is that... you've got to play the cards life deals you. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. But at least you're in the game. - Vic Fontaine, DS9.
-
- Whiney Peasant
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 9:31 am
- Dirk Cutlass
- Elder Sage
- Posts: 4691
- Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 9:42 am
- Location: GMT
Can you actually cast any spells as a Bard? As far as I am aware you need and INT or CHA of 10+X to cast X level spells. You're Bard can only cast lvl-0 spells !dethtrooper wrote:My other problem is my intel, and Charisma are only 10, been focusing on the fighter. Should I just ditch the lvl 4 Bard and go with Cleric? I have a +1 charisma cloak, but it doesnt seem to do much.

- mortzestus
- Team Member; Retired with Honors
- Posts: 3964
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 4:34 pm
- Location: Madrid, Spain (GMT +1)
-
- Whiney Peasant
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 9:31 am
- mortzestus
- Team Member; Retired with Honors
- Posts: 3964
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 4:34 pm
- Location: Madrid, Spain (GMT +1)
Cantrips are level 0 so you can cast them with CHA 10. However, that's everything you can cast unless you increase your base CHA. INT won't help you in the slightest for spellcasting purposes since your character is a bard.
Seriously, your problem is not the arcane casting failure with a cantrip that will heal 1-4 hp if you succeed. Your problem is that with CHA 10 you aren't getting access to the level 2 spells that the average bard gets by level 4. If you are interested at all in casting spells as a bard, raise your CHA first and think about Still Spell later. Being able to still your spells is not any good if you can't cast spells to begin with.
Seriously, your problem is not the arcane casting failure with a cantrip that will heal 1-4 hp if you succeed. Your problem is that with CHA 10 you aren't getting access to the level 2 spells that the average bard gets by level 4. If you are interested at all in casting spells as a bard, raise your CHA first and think about Still Spell later. Being able to still your spells is not any good if you can't cast spells to begin with.

Last edited by mortzestus on Wed Oct 05, 2005 9:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Dirk Cutlass
- Elder Sage
- Posts: 4691
- Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 9:42 am
- Location: GMT
What character level is your bard now?dethtrooper wrote:No I get a UMD failure or something. Cantrips are only level 1. I want to persue spell casting by increasing Int, or Charisma, but even get the damn arcane failure on healing cantrip.
You've got a bit of a problem. Bard's use CHA for spells if I recall.
You will need pump you ability increases into CHA (i.e. every 4 levels) to get that score up. But it will still be low, you will never be able to cast high level spells, you will not have many bonus spells. You will not have oodles of spell-slots available to use Still Spell on.
Sorry for the feedback, but this bard is going to suck as a caster. However, not impossible ... just a lot of hard work, with little reward until very late .. and then even then the reward isn't that good.
Also, a bard with 10 CHA is probably a bad start too. CHA is their primary ability (and affects they skills and songs per day, etc.)

-
- Whiney Peasant
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 9:31 am
Thanks for the honest feedback. I am lvl 11 fighter but my bard is 4. I kinda want the best of both worlds (being able to fight and cast spells). I plan to hit epic. Maybe I will just pump up Charisma, although it sounds I wont go that far with it. I guess rings ect wouldnt help much either with Charisma.
- p0m
- Scholar
- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:02 am
- Timezone: +10
- DM Avatar: Wintermute
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
- Contact:
*dies*dethtrooper wrote:Ok thanks my armour is full plate AC8 which I like, having a total AC25 with shield is nice.
Good god, how do you do _anything_ bardlike in that? Then again, I probably can't speak, I dropped wearing armour altogether for dex based AC, and the loss of failure.
As above though, still spell, or try to get your hands on some Mithril or Featherweight armour.
Player of: Dannar Sunrise/Blighte
Gennor Visson
Jert Vilodel
Gennor Visson
Jert Vilodel
- mortzestus
- Team Member; Retired with Honors
- Posts: 3964
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 4:34 pm
- Location: Madrid, Spain (GMT +1)
- Dirk Cutlass
- Elder Sage
- Posts: 4691
- Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 9:42 am
- Location: GMT
- p0m
- Scholar
- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:02 am
- Timezone: +10
- DM Avatar: Wintermute
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
- Contact:
Pft.. wuss.. airhead. Hm, might have gotten me there.Wyrmwing wrote:It all depends on the kind of bard you're playing.. not all are wussy airheads you know
My above statement was firmly tongue in cheek, as I know quite a few steelbards, just never understood their appreciation for armour

Player of: Dannar Sunrise/Blighte
Gennor Visson
Jert Vilodel
Gennor Visson
Jert Vilodel
- gwydion2
- Elder Sage
- Posts: 3681
- Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2003 9:37 pm
- Timezone: Gmt+1
- Location: Cardiff U.K.
The ability to cast spells of a given level, depends on base stat, without gear. So rings, cloaks etc don't help. You wont be much of a caster till you get at least 12 in the appropriate stat.dethtrooper wrote:Maybe I will just pump up Charisma, although it sounds I wont go that far with it. I guess rings ect wouldnt help much either with Charisma.
If you intend to always be a primary fighter, secondary bar, you could stop at 12 charisma and just use your first and second level slots for the hour per level buffing spells. That way you could remove your armour to buff in a non combat situation then suit up to fight. Still spell would still be useful. You wouldn't be able to cast lv3 spells but (I think) you could still use the lv3 slots for stilled lv2 spells.
- slave_of_emotions
- Scholar of Fools
- Posts: 470
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 10:04 pm
- Location: The European Union(Germany)
- Contact:
Since the team was anyways spellhooking all spells it would have been nice would they have changed them acording to the 3.0/3.5 rules where bards can cast spells in light armors without a chance for arcane spell failure.
Weapon and Armor Proficiency: A bard is proficient with all simple weapons, plus the longsword, rapier, sap, short sword, shortbow, and whip. Bards are proficient with light armor and shields (except tower shields). A bard can cast bard spells while wearing light armor without incurring the normal arcane spell failure chance. However, like any other arcane spellcaster, a bard wearing medium or heavy armor or using a shield incurs a chance of arcane spell failure if the spell in question has a somatic component (most do ). A multiclass bard still incurs the normal arcane spell failure chance for arcane spells received from other classes.
- Pathos Street
- King of Avlis Charades
- Posts: 4883
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 11:33 pm
- Timezone: CDT (GMT -5)
- Location: Hawkeye State
dethtrooper wrote:Thanks for the honest feedback. I am lvl 11 fighter but my bard is 4. I kinda want the best of both worlds (being able to fight and cast spells). I plan to hit epic. Maybe I will just pump up Charisma, although it sounds I wont go that far with it. I guess rings ect wouldnt help much either with Charisma.
Joined: 10 Sep 2005

Not trying to tell ya how to have fun, but have you considered stopping to smell the roses? There's a lot of things in Avlis that are more fun than hitting epic (IMHO, of course).
