pedsdmd wrote:Nightface, I think you read the original post and reassess this statement.
If you get off your "Roleplay or die" soapbox you will see that the original post has nothing to do with Powergaming or the lack of RP.
Never said anything intended as "Roleplay or Die". If it came across as that, I apologize and will endeavour to make statements that are clearer and less misleading in the future. My issue is, and always has been, the feeling I got that 40 wasn't good enough.
pedsdmd wrote:In fact, I do not have an epic character, i was hoping to have a interesting chat about what some of these players who have played for years envision their PC's doing after so much time and dedication and reaching such a rare accomplishment.
40th level is not an accomplishment. It's the eventual result of accruing a crapload of XP. Being Epic
is, and has nothing to do with levels. Kered Rose is a good example. I don't think he's over 20 (I might be wrong about this), but he has managed to make himself known throughout M'Chek, and gain a seat in the governmental body simply through persistence and clever RP. He now has a solid channel to help shape the policies and attitudes of an entire government. To me, that is what makes a character Epic.
pedsdmd wrote:If I heard correctly, there were originally only 20 lvs to begin with and it was raised to 21-40.
Was that a bad thing? Is it inconceivable to you that maybe something interesting could occur after 40.
Nope, it's not inconceivable. What was bothering me was the attitudes I was hearing that made it sound like being an over-20 simply meant you were closer to your goal over reaching 40.
pedsdmd wrote:Would it be so horrible to hear good/funny ideas about what may ocur for approx. 2 or 3 players after yrs of play?
No, it would be very pleasant. Unfortunately, I wasn't hearing any good or funny ideas, simply people drooling for better numbers, or extra feats, or a neat new race, or even divinity. If any of the people who were posting here don't think they sounded this way, then maybe
they should reassess their statements.
pedsdmd wrote:Do you think after 3 years of playing these players havent smelled any roses?
Those who have been here for 3 years most likely have. It's the ones who are breaking 30 after ONE year that I would wonder about.
pedsdmd wrote:If there was such a powergaming epidemic how come there are no 40th lvl players yet?
I never said there was a PGing "epidemic". I was pointing out that people were attaching no importance to anything other than how high they can get. Breaking 20 is supposed to mean something, and it doesn't seem to anymore.
pedsdmd wrote:Are you implying that Green is a Powergamer just because she is near 40th lvl?
Nope. You are inferring that. I never implied it.
pedsdmd wrote:I seems that you are very insecure for some reason unknown to me.
More personal attacks? Are these
really necessary? My IG interactions with you have always been pleasant, pedsdmd, and I really don't think this level of hostility is called for.
pedsdmd wrote:Or is that your general response to anyone who dare asks a question or is interested about topics of Epic nature?
You asked questions, I gave answers. Don't blame me if you don't like them. If it had been a general talk about being Epic or simply being over-20, then my tone may have been a bit different. However, the talk was all about wanting more. I found that very bothersome, so I respoded.
pedsdmd wrote:If or when you have kids are you gonna tell your daughters all boys are the devil and if you kiss them you will get pregnant?
Yep, have a daughter. Yep, going to tell her boys are the devil. Yep, when she eventually stops listening to me and starts dating, I'm going to have my sword collection very visible, and I am going to make sure those boys know how much danger they are in if they hurt her.
Not very fond of the kissing=pregnancy approach though.
pedsdmd wrote:I respect your opinion, i just dont see the reason for the negativity over a General discussion question that may affect only 2 or 3 PC's .
I was actually being dismissive in my first post. It was the second one that qualifies as being "negative". My negativity was in response to the attitudes displayed by some of the previous posts.
pedsdmd wrote:For the record I view Epic characters as having player development equaling or exceeding their character levels and who have had a profound effect on the game and who are well known for the roles they played IG.
Agreed, which is why I draw the delineation between Epics, and over-20s.
Here's a thought, why don't all of you who have been getting on my arse about this try answering
my questions...
1. What does it matter who reaches 40 first?
2. Since it's not likely to be too different to what they are doing now, why wonder about what they'll do after?
3. Why do we need more levels after 40?
They are essay questions, so no answer is wrong. Don't be surprised, however, if people don't agree with you.