Page 1 of 2
Knockdown : a little help?
Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 12:34 pm
by Alphonse
I tried searching to find this, but it seems searching through 200+ threads when someone will be able to answer this in seconds seems a bit pointless.
What feats are prerequisites for knockdown
Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 12:36 pm
by PsiOmega
None according to the manual (but we all know how correct that one is)
Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 12:39 pm
by Alphonse
i vaguely recall power attack being needed, but i might be confusing knockdown with cleave. Either way if someone can give me a definate answer that would be grand
Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 12:40 pm
by TheElvenKing
Knockdown has no prerequisite.
Improved Knockdown requires Knockdown (obviously) and an INT of 13+.
Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 12:41 pm
by Alphonse
TheElvenKing wrote:Knockdown has no prerequisite.
Improved Knockdown requires Knockdown (obviously) and an INT of 13+.
Excellent. Thankyou very much oh wise one

Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 1:08 pm
by Arieanne
Alphonse wrote:i vaguely recall power attack being needed, but i might be confusing knockdown with cleave.
Knockdown - see above.
Cleave - AFAIK, strength 13+.
Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 1:09 pm
by Jonezie
Arieanne wrote:Alphonse wrote:i vaguely recall power attack being needed, but i might be confusing knockdown with cleave.
Knockdown - see above.
Cleave - AFAIK, strength 13+.
Yes, but cleave also requires power attack.
Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 1:28 pm
by Serineth Swiftpaw
Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 1:39 pm
by Arieanne
Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 1:41 pm
by Alphonse
Serineth Swiftpaw wrote:It should be manditory for females. Who wants a woman that doesn't have great Cleavage?

I think i'm going to be awkward here and say i dont
Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 1:44 pm
by Arieanne
Alphonse wrote:Serineth Swiftpaw wrote:It should be manditory for females. Who wants a woman that doesn't have great Cleavage?

I think i'm going to be awkward here and say i dont
You are not awkward, you are physically healthy
*looks down at her cleavage and wonders whether it can be called "great" *

Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 1:49 pm
by Arieanne
Alphonse wrote:Arieanne wrote:Alphonse wrote:Serineth Swiftpaw wrote:It should be manditory for females. Who wants a woman that doesn't have great Cleavage?

I think i'm going to be awkward here and say i dont
You are not awkward, you are physically healthy
*looks down at her cleavage and wonders whether it can be called "great" *

gah. I meant i dont want a woman who has great cleavage. Its friday afternoon. my reading skills are falling rapidly
LOL
So....you are not healthy?

Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 1:49 pm
by Alphonse
Arieanne wrote:*looks down at her cleavage and wonders whether it can be called "great" *

I hearby open the official Alphonse Cleavage Evaluation service for any ladies wondering if they have great cleavage

Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 9:34 pm
by Arnimane
Official opinon:
95.6% of ANY cleavage you can personally get a glimpse of is to be considered great!!!! Call it a permission bonus.

Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 9:59 pm
by TripleAught
Dare I ask about the other 4.4%?
*shudders* Better not think too hard about what could be wrong with it.
Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 10:29 pm
by Serineth Swiftpaw
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 12:59 am
by Arcsylver
TripleAught wrote:Dare I ask about the other 4.4%?
*shudders* Better not think too hard about what could be wrong with it.
The other 4.4% would be the amount possessed by wrinkled old grandmothers that you wouldn't really want to have displayed in a public manner.
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 9:47 am
by Kareth
Serineth Swiftpaw wrote:It should be manditory for females. Who wants a woman that doesn't have great Cleavage?

*grins* It depends on what you mean by great
If you mean great as in huge then I would have to disagree
*thinks of Jordan and shudders*
But if you mean great as in good/nice then that it is a totally different matter

Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 1:01 pm
by Kitten
Honestly I don't think you necessarily have to have great cleavage, but I do wonder why you need 13 int for it...
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 2:41 pm
by Grunt
((Guy mode on))
In the next patch Bioware has added:
-Improved Cleav(ag)e: The fighter has trained hard, but not met satisfactory results. A trip to her local alchemist empowered her with this artifically enhanced cleav(ag)e that can floor many. However, most other female fighters can tell it is not her original.
-Stunning Cleav(ag)e: When caught in close combat, the opponent must make a will save or stand open mouth and dazed for 1d4 rounds + (skimpiness level of outfit)
-Overwhelming Cleav(ag)e: Things are REALLY out of control in bosom land... While in Power Attack mode, a successful cleav(ag)e hit will do an additional 2d6 of damage.
-Terrifying Cleav(ag)e: No those aren't 2 saddle bags she's carrying around her waist! A quick flash while in combat can send all but the most stout (or really desperate) opponents fleeing in terror. This effect lasts for 1d6 rounds, and the horrible image lasts a lifetime.
-Devastating Cleav(ag)e: Sure the warrior has back problems, and she needs to have "Bigby's supporting hands" cast on her in order to stand upright, but when she lets Devastating Cleav(ag)e fly, Opponents must make a reflex save against her bra size or suffer instant smothering, resulting in death. A successful save still deals 3d6 crushing damage and leaves a permanent smile on the opponent's face.
Unfortunately...I'm sure these will be nerfed by the team,

So, once again, those A cup having mages will still be uber.
((Guy mode off))
-Grunt
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 3:04 pm
by Arieanne
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 3:27 pm
by Jo' d
When you get old enough, there are no bad cleavages...*looks lovingly at his halfside* you learn to appreciate all the 'small' gifts givin.....
Jo'd
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 10:55 pm
by Chemical-Burn
So the manual saying for IKD you ownly need KD and BAB of +7 is wrong? you also need int of 13+ ?
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 10:59 pm
by Jonezie
Chemical-Burn wrote:So the manual saying for IKD you ownly need KD and BAB of +7 is wrong? you also need int of 13+ ?
Yup
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2005 7:52 pm
by Isengrim
Serineth Swiftpaw wrote:*cheers that he started a discussion that isn't consistant entirely of flames and insults

*
Hehehe, you dirty powerwemicgamer! Cats stink...
Foolproof disclaimer:
For anyone who doesn't get it, I am kidding.

And cats are lovely - my parents just brought me theirs for holidays and he's more fun than Avlis...
