Abdul_Caffeine wrote:I disagree.
Surely being told to do something, anything, by anyone less than Forian his bad self runs counter to everything that Forianism stands for? I mean, it's supposed to be an ethos of Do As Thou Wilt.
You're forgetting one simple fact: lots of people LIKE to be told what to do. So for them, Do As Thou Wilt might mean letting someone else make some decisions for them. That's of course not necessary, and probably not common, but I don't see how it's out of line with Forianism. Forian doesn't require people to become enlightened, after all. Moreover (and more importantly) Forian probably works against his own ends sometimes, in a vast muddle of confusion and illusion.
The influences of Grant Morrisson and Malaclypse the Younger seem to be falling over this project already. I can see why; they're massively entertaining and sound vaguely right. But, from where I'm standing, they're doctrinally different from Forianism.
As I said above, just because I like these influences doesn't actually mean they'll BE influences on the project. And I do not agree that any of the above listed influences are doctrinally different from Forianism.
Discordianism has tenets. Never eat a hotdog bun, except on Fridays when you must. Always use the official Eristic calendar. Obey the Law of Fives. Similarly, the Chaos Magic / Gnostic / Catharist / Buddhist melange that Morrisson used in The Invisibles has tenets. Good, evil and balance exist, although their contents vary.
Discordianism has no tenets. You will note that it is almost impossible to get two Discordians to agree about anything at all. Yes, some say hot dog buns are Bad, but others think they are Good, while many have no strong opinion. Likewise, there is no requirement to use the calendar, or to pay attention to the various laws and correspondences. Hells, the P.D. itself is massively self-contradictory, not unlike the Chuch of the Subgenius. The main teaching in my eyes can be summed up in two points: 1) Don't take anything too seriously, 2) Have some fun with it, and 3) There are only two points.
The Invisibles also have no tenets as a group. Hells, they're on both sides of their little private war, or all sides, as there are at times more than 4 different factions in their surreal struggle. Now, perhaps they do have tenets, from a Gnostic point of view (i.e. free yourself from the prison of the mind), but they don't agree on any means or methods, nor do their end views agree. Maybe it would be more accurate to say the only thing they share is an attitude.
This isn't Forianism. True Forianism only has the one tenet: do exactly what you like, when you like. Why should a potential Confounder go and fish and then sell the fish for a thousand gold? Surely a real Forianite would go and fish, and then halfway through, realise that, "I don't want to do this any more", and then go and do something else, like breaking into a nearby house, opening up a locked chest full of valuables, putting the fishing rod into it, and then leaving without taking anything. Any quest, no matter how bizarre or Pythonesque, is still a quest.
Right. But one of the wonderful things about Chaos is that it can often contradict itself freely. So while I agree completely that in general any set patterns and rules should be avoided, I also think it is perfectly in Forian's spirit to say, "Never let anyone tell you what to do. You have to ALWAYS think for yourself. Now go get me a fish, or you can't be a Confounder".
Hence the Crowley reference; he gives us a very good example of what can happen when people go around honestly believing that. I mean, when the 'OnHeartBeat: GetDesire() ObeyDesire()' ethos is interpreted in a fundamentalist way, then you'll get everything from Ayn Rand to Charles Manson to the Marquis de Sade.
I don't think Aleister is a good example of Chaotic Neutral thinking, honestly. He's more TN, in my eyes.
I'd also like to suggest V for Victory as subject material. It's damn good, but it also portrays the whole Lawful/Chaotic struggle which is important here.
I haven't read it yet, but have been meaning to. Alan Moore, right?
------
The above is OOC, written based on what I read from the canon which exists on this site. What follows is what I've developed while playing Aleksandros, the wandering priest who believes that Forian speaks to him. This is his personal view on the religion, and as such it should be taken with as much salt as needed. Or more. Or less. In fact, salt it as much as you like.
I like fish!
And of course it's OOC; this is an OOC forum. Well, that might be a good reason for a Forianite to speak IC, come to think of it.
Forianism is an intensely personal religion. While Mikonites might receive the scripture from their priesthood, a Forianite receives it from within. Forian isn't a god with an agenda or a plan. Forianites don't need to do anything in his name. He doesn't need to win anything or have anyone smitten, or have confusion spread for him. Forian knows that victory consists only of doing what you were going to do when you'd won.
Ahhhh. Yes, I completely agree. In a perfect world, there would be absolutely no preset quests for Forian. You're entirely right. However, we have to work within certain limitations, and one of those is this: quests for PrCs are scripted, not DM-driven. Now, I'll do what I can to retain some randomness, but there will of necessity be a certain amount of structure in the Confounder quests. Having said that, there's nothing wrong with having a bit of structure every now and then - Forianites can be perfectly law-abiding, orderly, organized people, at least for a few minutes at a time.
In other words, it's a faith of daisy chains and bloody massacres. When you want to pray, pray. When you want to sleep, sleep. When you want to wade in the gore of the guilty (or the innocent), do so. Live hand to mouth or in luxury, as the mood takes you, but never force yourself to do anything today because of what it means for tomorrow.
When you are hungry, eat.
What you are tired, sleep.
When you are enlightened, keep it down. The rest of us are eating and sleeping here.
In a way similar to the Discordian tenet of 'You Are The Pope' and Heinlein's refrain of 'Thou Art God', and even Luther's doctrine of personal communion, Forianism rests upon a personal dialogue between the believer and the deity. There cannot be a priesthood or any other intermediaries. Forian speaks to each. All a cleric of Forian can do is to teach people to listen.
100% right. Forian enlightenment comes from within. But so does Zen enlightenment, and yet Zen is characteristically a master-student practice. Priests have their place in such a religion, never doubt it. Give 'em koans to chew on, and smack 'em when they need it.
If Confounders exist, then they won't be an organisation where you get membership by doing something silly. Rather, Forian's true disciples will be the ones who say, "meh, I'd rather sit here in the grass and laugh" or "meh, I'd rather go and slaughter these bandits", depending on what they actually want to do at that moment.
That seems unnecessarily restrictive.
Anyway. Back OOC now. If you read all of that, I'm impressed. If you disagree, well, Do As Thou Wilt.
- Abdul
I always do.
- Aloro